Vélocio vs. Armstrong: Two Icons Who Changed Cycling Forever
- Elizabeth Gabel
- Apr 4
- 7 min read
Updated: May 3
In the pantheon of cycling, few figures stand further apart than Paul de Vivie, the 19th-century French idealist known as Vélocio, and Lance Armstrong, the hard-driving Texan who dominated, and then disgraced, the modern Tour de France. One rode through mountain passes in quiet contemplation. The other crushed rivals in a quest for absolute control.
Their stories, and their bikes, reflect the soul of two very different centuries.
This blog explores the critical legacy of Vélocio, his ascetic philosophy, minimalist ethos, and quiet mastery, and contrasts it with the rise of modern fitness titan Lance Armstrong. In tracing their divergent paths, we examine how long-distance cycling has transformed in pop culture: from the soulful practice of cycloenthusiasts seeking harmony with the road, to a high-stakes arena of metrics, machines, and marginal gains.
Beneath the gears and glory lies a deeper question; what have we gained, and what have we left behind?
In the midst of such transformation, is there still space for the kind of long-distance, zen-like presence Vélocio embodied, without the obsessive tech-and-mech intensity as seen in the Tour de France?
VÉLOCIO: The Monk of the Mountains
Long before carbon frames and peloton strategies, there was Vélocio: a soft-spoken Frenchman with a beard full of wisdom and a saddlebag full of nuts, fruit, and good intentions. Born in 1853 in Pernes-les-Fontaines, Paul de Vivie wasn't just a cyclist; he was a philosopher in motion.
He was a vegetarian in an era that celebrated meat and wine, a minimalist when excess was fashionable, and a teetotaler who believed the body should be treated as a temple even when riding through the Alps. Vélocio rose early to read ancient Greek, advocated for Esperanto, and believed that a bicycle should be ridden with humility and joy.
As for his unique moniker: Paul de Vivie adopted the pen name “Vélocio” as a fusion of two French ideas:
“Vélo” = short for vélocipède, the early word for bicycle
“-cio” = a suffix likely intended to evoke a sense of flow, speed, or classical flair (it resembles Italian or Latin endings, adding a poetic or philosophical touch)
He is honored to this day in France, most notably at the Col de la République, where a memorial stands near the summit—a fitting tribute to a man who climbed with his heart as much as his legs. Though he died in 1930, tragically struck by a car while cycling at age 76 much like in the ill-fated irony seen in Greek tragedies, his legacy rolls on in every self-supported rider who chooses simplicity over spectacle.
Vélocio vs. Armstrong: A Study in Contrasts
Two men. Two centuries. Two visions of what cycling could be.
On one side: Vélocio, the quiet innovator who pedaled toward self-mastery and simplicity. On the other: Armstrong, the relentless competitor who turned the bike into a battleground.
What follows is a side-by-side look at their origins, achievements, and the radically different roads they chose to ride.
VÉLOCIO Quick Facts: The Philosopher on Two Wheels
Full Name: Paul de Vivie
Born: April 29, 1853, in Pernes-les-Fontaines, France
Known For: Inventing and promoting the derailleur gear system; spiritual founder of randonneuring (long-distance, self-supported cycling)
Major Achievements:
Pioneered multi-speed bicycles in an era of single-gear machines
Founded the magazine Le Cycliste, advocating for lightweight, simple, self-reliant riding
Rode thousands of kilometers into old age, always in wool, always in grace
LANCE ARMSTRONG Quick Facts: The Juggernaut with a Dark Shadow
Full Name: Lance Edward Armstrong
Born: September 18, 1971, in Plano, Texas, USA
Known For: Winning seven consecutive Tours de France (1999–2005), later stripped due to doping
Major Achievements:
Came back from late-stage cancer to win elite races
Raised $500M+ for cancer research through Livestrong
Sparked international debate over ethics in sport, performance, and redemption
The Philosophies: Serenity vs. Supremacy
Vélocio’s Style:
Focused on efficiency, harmony, and inner peace
Advocated riding “within oneself,” without ego
Believed in minimalism: light bikes, long distances, no racing
His rides were spiritual journeys, not competitions
Armstrong’s Style:
Hyper-competitive, results-oriented
Obsessed with marginal gains, strategy, and dominance
Relied on team tactics, psychological warfare, and cutting-edge (and illicit) performance enhancements
His rides were battles. Winning was the only goal.
The Gear Game: Then and Now
In Vélocio’s time, most bicycles had only one gear—you pedaled with the same resistance whether riding uphill or cruising downhill.
The derailleur system, which he helped pioneer and promote, allowed riders to shift gears mid-ride by moving the chain across different-sized cogs. It made climbing easier and long-distance riding more accessible, though it was controversial and even banned from races at first.
In Armstrong’s peak years, his bikes featured 20 to 22 gears—usually a combination of two front chainrings and ten or eleven rear cogs—allowing for highly precise gear shifts tailored to every gradient and effort. These setups, combined with power meters, radios, and aerodynamic tuning, gave him unmatched control over pacing and performance.
Vélocio’s Tech: Minimal Tools, Maximum Soul
Early derailleur gear systems (developed by him and others)
Lightweight steel frames, leather saddles, cork bar grips
Wool clothing, no support teams, self-repair on the road
Emphasis on self-sufficiency and mechanical elegance
Armstrong’s Tech: Wattage for Warfare
Carbon fiber time-trial bikes with wind-tunnel testing
Power meters, heart rate monitors, team radios
Aerodynamic helmets, skinsuits, and deep-dish wheels
Sophisticated doping regimens masked with cutting-edge medical manipulation
Vélocio’s Seven Commandments for Cyclists
(Adapted in spirit from his writings and philosophy, per Randonneurs USA)
Make your stops short and infrequent so as not to lose your drive.
Eat lightly and often. Eat before you're hungry, and drink before you're thirsty.
Never ride to the point where you're too tired to eat or sleep.
Add layers before you're cold; remove them before you're hot. Don’t fear the sun, wind, or rain.
Avoid wine, meat, and tobacco—at least while riding.
Never rush. Ride within yourself, especially in the first few hours when you're tempted to go too hard.
Never pedal out of vanity. Don’t be a show-off.
These reflect a life of rhythm, wisdom, and moderation—cycling as communion with self and world.
Armstrong’s “Unspoken” Seven Commandments for Winning
(Reconstructed from interviews, quotes, and patterns of behavior)
“Pain is temporary. Quitting lasts forever.”
Win at all costs. If you're not first, you're forgotten.
Dominate your rivals mentally and physically.
Leverage every scientific, nutritional, and medical advantage.
Build a loyal, tactical team around you.
Control the narrative, always.
If the system is flawed, master it better than anyone else.
These reflect a world of competition, ambition, and a relentless hunger for supremacy—even if the cost is your legacy.
By the Numbers: Tour Riders vs. Vélocio
Metric | Tour de France Rider | Vélocio (Typical) |
Daily mileage | 100–120 miles | 130+ miles |
Estimated hours to cover ~100 miles | 4–6 hours | 10–13 hours |
Climbing per ride | 5,000–10,000 ft/day | 6,000–18,000 ft in a single push |
Bike weight | ~15 lbs (modern) | 50+ lbs |
Gear system | 22-speed | Early derailleur or single-speed |
Support | Full team support | Solo, self-navigated |
Nutrition | Energy gels, sports drinks | Real food, no meat, no alcohol |
Recovery | Hotel, massage, nutrition | Saddlebag camping, maybe a baguette |
Their Lasting Influence on Cycling
Vélocio’s Impact:
Popularized the derailleur, paving the way for multi-speed bikes used today
Inspired the randonneuring and cyclotourism movements
Advocated for simplicity, self-reliance, and riding as a spiritual practice
Left a legacy of minimalism and mindfulness in cycling culture
Armstrong’s Impact:
Revolutionized training with scientific rigor, team strategy, and tech integration
Raised the global profile of the Tour de France and cycling as a professional sport
Sparked intense debates about ethics, doping, and redemption in competitive athletics
Left a controversial but lasting mark on performance culture in endurance sports
Comparison Conclusion: Two Wheels, Two Worlds
Where Vélocio saw the bicycle as a tool of personal liberation, Armstrong wielded it as a weapon of conquest. Both changed the sport forever—but their legacies lead us to very different questions.
Vélocio asks: What does it mean to ride well?
Armstrong asks: What does it take to win?
And perhaps the modern cyclist lives somewhere in the space between with a blend of grit and grace, ambition and awareness, discipline and delight.
Fuel for Thought: Where Did Armstrong Go wrong?
Per Armstrong's time period, long distance cycling went wrong when winning mattered more than riding.
When the joy of the open road got paved over by sponsorship logos and blood bags.
When we stopped asking “how far can I go?” and started asking “how fast can I destroy?”When team cars replaced saddlebags.When silence and scenery got traded for data and dominance.
It went wrong when cycling stopped being a pilgrimage and became a performance.
And yet…It also went wrong the way all stories do: gradually, then suddenly.
Technology wasn’t the enemy; ego was.
Vélocio warned us. With every gear he fine-tuned, he whispered:Use it wisely. Use it humbly. Never pedal out of vanity.
Cyclotourism Today: A Quiet Rebellion
There is still a simple, soulful purity and hope in long-distance cycling.
The modern world may revolve around speed, rankings, and carbon fiber, but a growing global community of cyclists continues to honor Vélocio’s vision: slow travel, self-reliance, and deep connection to the road.
Cyclotourism—once a fringe concept—is now a vibrant subculture. Riders pack tents, tools, and trail mix, choosing winding roads over fast lanes. They measure their journeys not in watts or medals, but in moments of stillness, discovery, and endurance. Across Europe, the U.S., and beyond, bikepacking and randonneuring are enjoying a revival.
It’s not about performance. It’s about presence.
Vélocio would recognize these riders instantly—not by their speed, but by their spirit.
Sources
“Vélocio’s Seven Commandments.” Randonneurs USA Newsletter, vol. 4, no. 2, Apr. 2002. https://rusa.org/newsletter/04-02-09.htmlhttps://rusa.org/newsletter/04-02-09.html
“Do You Know the Story of Paul de Vivie (1853–1930), the Inventor of Cyclotourisme?” Biking France Blog, 25 Aug. 2020, https://bikingfranceblog.com/2020/08/25/do-you-know-the-story-of-paul-de-vivie-1853-1930-the-inventor-of-cyclotourisme/.
“Paul de Vivie.” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_de_Vivie.
“Lance Armstrong.” Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Lance-Armstrong.
“Lance Armstrong Net Worth.” Celebrity Net Worth, https://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-athletes/richest-cyclists/lance-armstrong-net-worth/.
“How Vélocio Helped Create the Modern Bicycle.” CyclingTips, https://cyclingtips.com/2019/10/how-velocio-helped-create-the-modern-bicycle/.
コメント