Walter Dill Scott: The Psychologist Who Shaped Modern Marketing
- Elizabeth Gabel
- Apr 15
- 18 min read
Walter Dill Scott didn’t sell soap or insurance. He sold the blueprint for how to sell anything.
In the spring of 1917, as the United States plunged into World War I, a bespectacled psychology professor arrived at an Army training camp with an audacious proposal. Walter Dill Scott, then 48 years old, believed he could scientifically select the best soldiers and officers for the nation’s new fighting force. Army brass were skeptical—after all, what could a scholar of the mind know about war? Yet by war’s end, Scott’s methods were vindicated and he was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal for revolutionizing military personnel selection.
It was a triumphant milestone in a career that had already transformed American advertising and was about to reshape higher education. But who was the man behind these innovations?
Walter Dill Scott was more than a pioneering psychologist; he was a complex blend of idealist and pragmatic opportunist, a farmboy-turned-professor driven by both personal ambition and a sincere belief in the power of psychology to better society.
From Prairie to PhD: Early Ambitions and Ideals
Walter Dill Scott’s story began far from any laboratory or boardroom. He was born May 1, 1869, in the tiny farming community of Cooksville, Illinois. The second of five children, young Walter grew up doing arduous farm chores, his schooling squeezed into “rare free moments” around tending the land.
This hardscrabble upbringing instilled a tireless work ethic. Both Walter and his brother John dreamed not of farming but of educating others. Through grit and scholarship aid, Walter left the farm for college, entering Northwestern University in 1891.
Only thirty years old and perched on the icy lip of Lake Michigan, Northwestern University in the 1890s was a Methodist enclave of ambition and austerity. Just thirty minutes north of Chicago—but a world apart—the campus was little more than a handful of stone and brick buildings, surrounded by wind-scoured prairie and frozen lakefront for nearly half the year.
The student body numbered only in the hundreds and was overwhelmingly male. Many arrived on foot or by horse-drawn cart, their boots crunching across snow-crusted paths. Dormitory fireplaces were stocked with coal; students warmed their hands as they pored over Latin, rhetoric, and moral philosophy by lamplight. By day, it was a place of seriousness and scripture. By night, students gathered for debate, hymns, or late walks under the ice-cracked moon, dreaming of the industrial century rushing toward them.
At Northwestern, Scott thrived. He was no cloistered bookworm; he tutored classmates to pay tuition and threw himself into campus life.
He served as class president, edited the yearbook, and even manned the line as a left guard on the football team. Academically gifted (elected to Phi Beta Kappa, a prestigious academic honor society recognizing exceptional achievement in the liberal arts and sciences.), Scott harbored an idealistic goal: to become the president of a university in China.
In the late 19th century, this likely meant joining a missionary enterprise—a hint of altruism in his ambitions. To prepare, Scott earned a divinity degree in 1898, and that same year married his college sweetheart, Anna Marcy Miller.
But no opportunity in China materialized. Instead, Scott’s growing fascination with the new science of psychology led him to Germany to study under Wilhelm Wundt, the famed founder of experimental psychology.
Immersed in Wundt’s Leipzig laboratory, Scott embraced the cutting edge of research into human consciousness. This European sojourn was “a crucial turning point in his life.”
He earned a Ph.D. in psychology in 1900, just as the discipline was separating from philosophy to stand on scientific footing. Armed with this training – and joined by his equally scholarly wife, who earned her own Ph.D. in Germany—Scott returned to the U.S. as one of the first generation of American psychologists. Almost immediately, he secured a post at his beloved Alma Mater, Northwestern, teaching psychology and pedagogy, quickly rising to full professor and founding the university’s psychology department by 1909.
Scott’s early career reflected both intellectual curiosity and an eagerness to apply ideas in practice.
His mentor Wundt had kindled his interest in how psychology could solve real-world problems. Scott “devoted all of his psychological career to researching methods of social control and human motivation, ”not in a sinister sense, but in hopes of optimizing human effort and organization.
He was inspired by figures like Francis Galton, who sought to use science to organize society, yet Scott put a democratic twist on those elitist ideas: he emphasized individual differences and personal development over rigid heredity.
In other words, he believed people’s abilities could be measured and then guided to best serve both the individual and society. That optimistic, Progressive-Era faith in scientific management of human affairs would define his work.
The Psychology of Persuasion: Scott’s Advertising Revolution
Fate intervened shortly thereafter in the form of an advertising executive who knocked on Scott’s door.
The business world was booming with new products, and advertisers were desperate to make their pitches more effective. Could psychology help?
Scott was intrigued by the challenge. He recognized that the principles of psychology could offer valuable insights into consumer behavior and decision-making processes. This realization sparked his interest in exploring how psychological concepts could be applied to the field of advertising.
In the early 1900s, advertising was still a chaotic blend of exaggeration, snake oil, and huckster bravado. The idea of applying psychology to selling was almost laughable—until Scott stepped in.
In 1902, Walter Dill Scott published The Psychology of Advertising in Theory and Practice, a pioneering work that applied psychological principles to the field of advertising. Building on this foundation, he released the first edition of The Psychology of Advertising in 1908, followed by subsequent editions, with the fifth edition appearing in 1913. These texts became foundational in the emerging discipline of advertising psychology.
Scott’s approach was both scientific and unabashedly persuasive. He rejected the notion that consumers are rational decision-makers. Instead, drawing on early psychology of suggestion, he argued that people could be influenced at a subconscious level. “Consumers don’t act rationally,” Scott insisted they can be swayed almost hypnotically by advertising that appeals to their emotions and habits.
Scott's approach emphasized the power of suggestion over rational argument in influencing consumer behavior. He proposed that the human mind, far from being a rational agent, was actually pliable. Emotions, not logic, drove most purchases.
He identified three levers of suggestibility that make an ad effective:
Emotion
Sympathy
Sentimentality
If an advertisement could stir a feeling (joy, fear, desire), gain the audience’s sympathetic interest, or invoke sentimental associations, it would overcome rational resistance. Advertising, Scott believed, was “primarily a persuasive tool, rather than an informational device,” one that works on the mind “in a nearly hypnotic manner.”
From these ideas, Walter Dill Scott laid out practical guidelines that would change advertising forever. He advised marketers to use the “direct command”—tell people exactly what to do, as if the suggestion itself compels action.
Scott's idea was controversial at the time. But he didn’t believe people were stupid—he believed they were human.
An example from his era: an ad bluntly urging “Use Hoover Vacuum Cleaners” makes a stronger impression than a polite description of the product’s merits.
Scott also championed the now-ubiquitous coupon, not primarily as a discount but as a psychological device: the act of clipping and sending in a coupon subtly commits the reader to the next step. It “required consumers to take direct action,” engaging them and making them more likely to follow through and buy.
Scott was equally insistent on the power of visuals and context in ads. A good advertisement, he said, should grab attention with an illustration, one that is eye-catching, relevant, and easily understood. People are inherently visual creatures; the image lures the reader to then absorb the sales message in the text.
Scott’s early advertising studies didn’t just theorize about the unconscious. He put them into practice. He conducted experiments on how font choices, color layouts, and even ad placement could influence attention and retention.
His conclusions—novel then, obvious now—suggested that people could be influenced without realizing it. In short, Walter Dill Scott professionalized manipulation.
He urged companies to place ads in publications that the target audience trusts and respects, so that the prestige of the medium rubs off on the product.
“Advertisements are utilized most effectively when large numbers of the right kind of people see them in a publication which adds confidence,” Scott explained, emphasizing the importance of a publication’s tone and credibility.
These principles might seem self-evident today, but at the turn of the 20th century, they were groundbreaking. By 1910, Scott’s psychologically informed advertising techniques were being adopted by advertisers nationwide, yielding remarkable success.
While contemporaries like Frank H. Dukesmith and Arthur Frederick Sheldon were developing structured sales models—Dukesmith outlining a four-step process in 1904 and Sheldon emphasizing the importance of the "action" step—Scott distinguished himself by applying psychological theories directly to advertising practices. His work didn't just parallel the emerging AIDA model (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action); it provided a scientific foundation for understanding how each stage influenced consumer behavior.
A marketing trade journal later noted that the contemporary AIDA strategy "has roots in Scott’s writings" and his stage-by-stage understanding of consumer engagement. Scott demonstrated that selling was as much a psychological endeavor as it was a business one, transforming advertising from a hit-or-miss art into a research-based industry.
Not everyone was entirely comfortable with Scott’s philosophy. His frank talk of consumers as suggestible creatures, pliable under skilled manipulation, raised early questions about the ethics of advertising.
His work laid the groundwork for ongoing discussions about the balance between persuasive advertising and consumer autonomy. Was it right to push emotional buttons to make people want things they hadn’t planned to buy?
Scott, for his part, saw it as progress—a way to efficiently match products with people’s latent desires. He wanted to “make the marketplace more efficient” through the “rationalization of consumer…activities, especially by appealing to the self-interest” of shoppers. In other words, he believed persuading consumers was ultimately win-win, even a moral uplift by way of its outcomes: businesses sold more, and people obtained goods that would improve their lives or satisfy real needs (even needs the ad had helped create).
It was a very early 20th-century optimism about business and psychology marching hand-in-hand. Modern critics may cringe at the manipulative undertones, but Scott’s ideas undeniably worked—and they shaped advertising practice for generations.
Taking Psychology to War
By the time World War I erupted, Walter Dill Scott had established himself as America’s preeminent applied psychologist. He had proven his worth in the cut-throat world of advertising; now he was eager to serve the country and further demonstrate psychology’s power on a grand stage. When the U.S. declared war in 1917, Scott and his colleagues at the Carnegie Institute’s Bureau of Salesmanship Research (where he was then director) volunteered en masse to help the war effort.
Scott had recently been studying how to identify effective salesmen; he realized those same tools could identify capable military officers and specialists.
He drafted an ambitious proposal to apply “scientific methods” to Army personnel selection, essentially an early form of what we now call job aptitude testing.
At first, the Army was not impressed. The commandant at Camp Plattsburg brusquely rejected Scott’s proposal “in no uncertain terms.” But Scott persisted. He managed to get a sympathetic hearing from an assistant Secretary of War, and won permission for a trial run at another camp. In that trial, Scott’s team devised rating scales and tests to predict soldiers’ potential—for example, assessing leadership qualities and technical skills among trainees. The results were eye-opening: the tests identified the same men the Army considered its best officers, confirming the method’s validity.
With evidence in hand, Scott returned to Plattsburg and “after a vigorous effort” finally won the skeptics over.
Once implemented, Scott’s classification system was a runaway success. It allowed the Army to sort vast numbers of recruits into roles where they’d be most effective, whether as infantrymen, engineers, linguists, or officers. By war’s end, his system was used in every branch of the U.S. Army, both at home and in Europe. Scott’s committee essentially built the Army’s first human resources department: discovering what abilities each job needed, matching each man to a suitable role, and promoting officers based on merit and performance rather than just pedigree.
This was a radical departure in military culture, which traditionally relied on subjective judgment and social connections for assigning and promoting personnel. Thanks to Scott’s methods, countless soldiers were shifted into positions that better fit their talents, improving military efficiency.
For the first time, the state was using psychological tools to sort citizens not by class or family name, but by cognitive potential. Scott had helped make personality a national resource.
The Army credited him with solving “the problem of selecting not only officers but also men whose aptitudes would fit them for training as specialists and technicians of many kinds.”
In contrast to the Army’s controversial IQ testing program of the same period, which had aimed to measure raw intelligence and ended up labeling half of draftees as “morons” to the embarrassment of the Army, Scott’s practical approach proved far more useful.
The Army leadership hailed Scott’s classification project as a great success. In 1918 he was honored with the Distinguished Service Medal, one of the highest military awards, for his contributions to the war effort.
By the war’s close, Walter Dill Scott had shown that psychology could be a matter of life and death – that tests and surveys could put the right man in the right place, making an army (or any organization) stronger and more effective.
This wartime episode reveals much about Scott’s character. It took courage and confidence to push an unproven idea to top generals, and persistence to overcome rejection. It also showed his earnest patriotism and idealism—he donated his lab’s services for free, determined to help “utilize the talents and skills of large numbers of people” in a time of crisis.
At the same time, the episode was a shrewd validation of his work. Scott seized an opportunity to showcase applied psychology on the national stage, which certainly boosted his own professional profile (he was elected President of the American Psychological Association in 1919 on the strength of this achievement)
In truth, Scott’s war service was likely driven by both genuine public spirit and a recognition that success would cement psychology’s credibility.
As one historian noted, Scott was “ahead of his time” in fusing scientific research with real-world applications. World War I simply became the ultimate proving ground for his ideas.
The Business of Human Efficiency
Fresh from his military triumphs, Scott wasted no time turning his psychological tools to peacetime industries. In 1919, he and several associates founded The Scott Company, Engineers and Consultants in Industrial Personnel, with offices in Chicago, Philadelphia and beyond. It was one of the first management consulting firms specializing in what we now call industrial-organizational psychology—helping businesses hire the right people and boost worker efficiency through psychological methods.
In its first year, the firm advised over 40 companies, tackling problems from employee testing to sales training. Scott was now effectively a businessman as much as an academic, monetizing the expertise he’d honed in the classroom and the trenches.
The consulting firm flourished, but that same year another calling came—one that appealed to Scott’s loyalty and loftier ideals. Northwestern University, his alma mater, was in dire straits after the war. The president had resigned, the institution was financially shaky, and morale was low.
In 1920, Northwestern’s board implored Walter Dill Scott to take the helm as the university’s president. It was a crossroads moment: continue building his private enterprise or answer the call of educational service.
Scott chose Northwestern, later explaining that the “opportunity for service to his Alma Mater” and the challenge of revitalizing it proved decisive. He left day-to-day business behind (though the Scott Company continued under others) and moved into the president’s office that fall.
What Scott accomplished over the next 19 years at Northwestern validated that decision many times over. By all accounts, he was an extraordinarily effective university leader, applying his psychological insight and persuasive talents to make Northwestern one of the nation’s great institutions. He immediately tackled the university’s three biggest problems: a shaky financial base, inadequate facilities, and a fragmented organizational structure.
It was a quiet reign—he wasn’t flashy, but by all measures, his results were stunning.
During Scott’s tenure (1920–1939), Northwestern’s endowment swelled from $5.6 million to $26.7 million. He was a fundraising wizard, cultivating wealthy benefactors with patience and charm. He quietly and effectively persuading one donor to eventually give $28 million for a new engineering school, and securing many other major gifts for libraries, dormitories, stadiums and more. The value of Northwestern’s physical plant quadrupled under his watch as new buildings rose on both the Evanston and Chicago campuses.
Scott didn’t just pad the coffers; he also reimagined the university’s very mission. He established new schools, including a School of Journalism and a School of Speech, expanding Northwestern’s academic repertoire. He modernized governance, giving faculty more voice by creating a University Senate. Ever the psychologist, Scott even brought industrial personnel practices into academia: in 1926 he founded one of the first university Personnel Offices to provide professional counseling to students on education, careers, and personal matters. Tellingly, this office was funded by a Chicago businessman whom Scott convinced to support student guidance, making it a perfect merge of his donor network and belief in human factor engineering. The goal, as Scott defined it, was to promote “the systematic consideration of the individual, for the sake of the individual, and by specialists in the field.”
In an era when college students largely fended for themselves, Scott institutionalized student support services, reflecting his conviction that nurturing individuals was key to both personal and organizational success.
Through it all, Walter Dill Scott never lost sight of the “public service” role of education. He partnered with civic leaders to create applied research centers—a Scientific Crime Detection Lab to aid law enforcement, an Air Law Institute to guide the budding aviation industry, a Traffic Institute to improve road safety. These moves sprang from his philosophy that a university, as he put it, “performs the highest possible form of service to mankind.”
It was the same impulse that drove him to volunteer in WWI and to optimize advertising: a belief that scientific knowledge should be used to serve society’s needs, whether by catching criminals, preventing accidents, or educating citizens. If that service could be done efficiently and at scale, then all the better.
By the time Scott retired from Northwestern in 1939, he had transformed the institution and left an indelible legacy. A colleague memorialized him as “a dedicated man” whose “boundless optimism,” “simplicity, modesty, [and] friendliness” endeared him to all.
Indeed, the Board of Trustees noted that Dr. Scott had written his name “imperishably” into Northwestern’s history. The shy farm boy from Illinois had become not just an academic leader but a beloved figure in the community.
The Man Behind the Method: Idealist or Opportunist?
Walter Dill Scott’s life is a study in the intersection of ambition and idealism. On one hand, his résumé reads like a catalogue of personal success. He is undoubtedly heralded as celebrated professor, author, wartime hero, business founder, university president. He was clearly driven to achieve. The fact that he sought a university presidency while still in his twenties shows early ambition.
Throughout his career, he was proactive in pursuing opportunities: he didn’t wait for someone else to apply psychology to advertising or to the Army; he stepped forward first. This opportunistic streak meant Scott often found himself in uncharted territory, where failure was as possible as fame.
That he succeeded repeatedly speaks to a canny strategic mind and relentless determination. Yet those who knew Scott consistently described him as kind, optimistic, and altruistically motivated.
He was not the stereotype of a cutthroat executive. In fact, his demeanor was noted for “simplicity” and “modesty.” Despite operating in competitive arenas, Scott retained a certain earnestness. He genuinely believed in what he was selling whether it was a product in an ad or the mission of a university.
Look closely at his endeavors and you find a guiding ideal: helping society run more harmoniously by understanding people. He saw no shame in persuasion or profit, so long as they served a larger good. His writings often returned to the theme of efficiency with a human touch. He advocated giving workers pleasant environments because it would boost productivity, a relatively humane stance for his time. He spoke of guiding each person into the right job “for the sake of the individual” as much as for the company. Even his advertising work, arguably the most mercenary, was couched in a quasi-utopian vision that matching products to people’s emotional needs would benefit both consumer and seller.
But there's a darker question running beneath Scott’s legacy: when does influence become control? The same techniques he pioneered would later justify propaganda, employee surveillance, and psychometric filtering. Scott never lived to see the era of Cambridge Analytica—the firm had harvested personal data from up to 87 million Facebook users without their consent in 2018, using it to build psychological profiles and influence voter behavior in major political campaigns. Yet, he helped build its philosophical foundation.
To be sure, Scott was a man of his era, and not every modern observer would find his views benign.
His fascination with “social control” and ability testing had a paternalistic edge. Like many early psychologists, he flirted with the idea that society could be engineered if only the right experts pulled the levers. In practice, however, Scott’s interventions were generally supportive rather than repressive. Where others used intelligence tests to label and exclude (recall the Army IQ tests that stigmatized low scorers), Scott used applied psychology to include and optimize – to find the talent in every recruit or student and put it to best use. This fundamentally positive approach reflects his idealistic faith in human potential. He assumed people could improve and excel if guided correctly, an outlook undoubtedly shaped by his own rise from rural poverty to intellectual prominence.
Even in the rough-and-tumble business world, Scott seems to have played the role of gentle visionary more than ruthless tycoon. As a consultant he preached cooperation between labor and management and the uplift of worker efficiency without exhausting the worker. He downplayed factors like fatigue or “stimulants” (e.g. pushing workers too hard) in favor of inspiration and habit development. If anything, some critics thought him too optimistic about glossing over workplace grievances – but it was consistent with his sunny belief in progress.
In sum, Walter Dill Scott was a man who wedded pragmatism to principle. He had an uncanny knack for turning psychological theory into practical techniques that made money or solved problems, which certainly advanced his personal stature. But at each step, he also articulated a broader mission of service. He wanted to make commerce more efficient and consumers happier; to win the war and help young men find suitable careers; to make Northwestern financially secure and improve the education it delivered.
That dual lens – personal success yoked to public benefit – is perhaps the key to understanding his personality.
Far from seeing a conflict between helping people and advancing himself, Scott saw them as aligned. If psychology could make businesses prosper, armies stronger, or students more successful, then he too would succeed. And vice versa: his personal achievements opened doors for him to implement programs that helped others on a grand scale.
Legacy of a Pioneer: Scott's Influence on Marketing and Business Psychology
Walter Dill Scott died in 1955 at age 86, lauded as one of the founding fathers of applied psychology. His legacy is everywhere, yet his name is little known outside academic circles today.
Scott’s influence endures in the fabric of modern marketing and organizational practices. His principles of suggestion and direct command resonate in today's advertising strategies, where compelling visuals and concise messages aim to elicit immediate responses.
In corporate environments, the use of personality assessments and structured interviews for hiring and placement echoes Scott's early work in military classification and industrial consulting. The foundational concepts he introduced—leveraging emotion, habit, and sympathy—continue to underpin contemporary approaches in both marketing and human resource management.
Perhaps Scott’s greatest legacy, however, is the example he set for how psychologists could engage with the world. At the dawn of the 20th century, psychology was an infant science often dismissed as abstract or trivial. Walter Dill Scott helped change that by showing what a “practical psychologist” could do. He was among the first to step out of the ivory tower and prove that understanding the mind had real economic and social value. In 1968, a business historian dubbed him “Pioneer Industrial Psychologist,” a man ahead of his time in applying controlled research to business and management.
But perhaps the best measure of Scott’s impact is how ordinary his ideas seem today—a victim of their own success.
We take for granted that ads seek to seduce rather than inform, or that employers give vocational tests, because Scott’s innovations have become commonsense. He blended persuasion, emotion and behaviorism into the DNA of modern marketing, and injected scientific selection into the gears of organizations, quietly reshaping 20th-century American life.
Yet, behind those enormous changes was a person of flesh-and-blood humility. In the words of Northwestern’s board of trustees memorial, Walter Dill Scott was a “dedicated man” with “boundless optimism” who truly believed education (and by extension, knowledge) was the highest service to mankind.
Kind but shrewd, idealistic but action-oriented, Scott bridged the gap between knowing and doing. He spent his life trying to understand what makes people tick—and then used that knowledge to get them to buy, to fight, to learn, and to become the best version of themselves.
In doing so, he not only left an imprint on his era, but also a lesson for our own: that science and humanism need not be enemies, and that the minds and hearts of people are the ultimate frontier for innovation.
Medill IMC Honors Scott's Legacy: Nurturing Customer-First Marketing Leaders
Walter Dill Scott's legacy continues to thrive at Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Media, Integrated Marketing Communications. In recognition of his pioneering contributions to advertising, marketing communications, and education, Medill annually bestows the Walter Dill Scott Award upon outstanding students in the Integrated Marketing Communications (IMC) program. This honor celebrates students who exemplify excellence in the field, reflecting Scott's enduring influence on marketing practices and education.
Scott's tenure as Northwestern's 10th president from 1919 to 1939 was marked by significant advancements, including the establishment of Medill in 1921. His vision for integrating psychological principles into marketing and education laid the groundwork for the IMC program's emphasis on data-driven, customer-centric strategies.
The Walter Dill Scott Award serves not only as a tribute to his legacy but also as an inspiration for future marketing leaders committed to innovation and ethical practices.
Through this award, Medill reinforces its commitment to fostering marketing professionals who, like Scott, blend analytical rigor with a deep understanding of human behavior, ensuring that his visionary approach continues to shape the industry.
About the Author:
Liz Gabel is a Charlotte-based marketing content strategist and copywriter who blends classical storytelling with data-driven strategy. With a background in Classics and a Master’s in Integrated Marketing Communications from Northwestern University, she specializes in creating empathetic, conversion-focused content for brands across leading industries. Her work spans higher education, healthcare, tech, and more—always with a focus on making brands more human.
In 2021, she was honored with the Walter Dill Scott Award, recognizing her outstanding achievements in the IMC program. More of her work can be found at www.lizgabel.com.
Sources:
Wikipedia. "Walter Dill Scott." Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walter_Dill_Scott
Greenwood, John. "Psychologists Go to War." Behavioral Scientist. https://behavioralscientist.org/psychologists-go-war/
Scott, Walter Dill. The Psychology of Advertising. Small, Maynard & Co., 1913. https://archive.org/details/psychologyadvert00scotrich
Scott, Walter Dill. Increasing Human Efficiency in Business. Macmillan, 1911. https://archive.org/details/increasinghumane00scotuoftInternet Archive
Northwestern University Archives. "Presidents of Northwestern: Walter Dill Scott." Northwestern University. https://web.archive.org/web/20181107114950/http://exhibits.library.northwestern.edu/archives/exhibits/presidents/scott.html
New Design Group. "Understanding the Psychological on Advertising." New Design Group. https://www.newdesigngroup.ca/blog/digital-marketing/short-history-psychology-advertising/
Lynch, Edmund C. "Walter Dill Scott: Pioneer Industrial Psychologist." Business History Review, vol. 42, no. 2, 1968, pp. 149–170. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/business-history-review/article/walter-dill-scott-pioneer-industrial-psychologist/691B3D2E903F6514A8E9D6ECA2CFFC49
Media Studies Press. "The Psychology of Advertising (1913)." Media Studies Press. https://www.mediastudies.press/pub/emet-scott-advertising
UWaterlooPsych380. "Walter Dill Scott." YouTube, 10 Apr. 2015. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YJyaF61ULvg
Medill School of Journalism. "Walter Dill Scott Award." Northwestern University. https://www.medill.northwestern.edu/about-us/awards/walter-dill-scott-award.html
Comments